Rwandan _Turkish and European Administrative decisions about human rights
Rwandan, Turkish And European Administrative Decisons About Human Rights

Jacques KABANO, Mustafa ÇAKIR

ABSTRACT
The powers of all Public authorities are subordinated to the law. The primary purpose of administrative law, therefore is to keep the powers of the government within their legal bounds, so as to protect the citizen against their abuse. If there is power there must be duty and this is the concern of administrative law to see that the public authorities can be compelled to perform their duties if they make default. These duties involve protect human rights and respect them. Rwanda as an African country and the former German and Belgian colony which has made its legal system a Romano-Germanic one has no special administrative courts but administrative cases are handled by specialized chambers in the ordinary courts . Turkey to the other side has a long history of judiciary from the ottoman empire to now , various reforms have been done to fit the European model as Turkey is a candidate to the European Union. In Turkey administrative cases have to be submitted into administrative courts. In this paper we will study human rights in Administrative courts or the cases on human rights which reached the courts due to an administrative decision. We will attempt some cases which involved the countries in the European Court of Human Rights.
Keywords: Human Rights, Administrative decision, Administrative Law,Administrative court.